ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ is again attacking agency efforts to impose Project Labor Agreements (PLAs) on federal construction projects.Ìý This week, ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ sent letters to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Navy Facilities Engineering Command expressing strong concerns against their decisions to impose a project labor agreement (PLA) on three separate projects.
Monday, ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½Â to the Corps’ Fort Worth District questioning the potential use of a PLA for the Comstock Border Patrol Task Order.Ìý ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ also to Corps’ Omaha District addressing the potential use of PLAs on large-scale construction projects within the Colorado Springs Metropolitan Statistical Area, which contains Fort Carson and the U.S. Air Force Academy.Ìý ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ on Monday to naval officials regarding the potential use of PLAs for a large-scale construction project within the Joint Base Andres, Camp Springs, Maryland area, which includes the construction of an ambulatory care center.
While ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ neither supports nor opposes PLAs in general, ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ strongly opposes government mandates for PLAs on publically funded construction projects.Ìý ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ is committed to free and open competition in all public construction markets and believes that publically-funded contracts should be awarded without regard to the lawful labor relations policies and practices of the government contractor.Ìý To date, all 32 letters ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ has submitted to federal agencies in opposition to PLA mandates has resulted in withdrawal of their PLA requirement.Ìý ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ will continue to submit letters encouraging free and open competition on all federal contracts.
For more information, please contact Marco Giamberardino at (703) 837-5325 or giamberm@agc.org.Ìý
- ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½
- Education
- News
- Connect
- Benefits
- Events