Intensifying its effort to dissuade the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) from interpreting its new recordkeeping regulations to restrict drug testing or safety incentive programs, 乌鸦传媒 of America presses for a formal audience with the top OSHA official.
At the heart the controversy surrounding the new regulations are two provisions that merely state:
- You must establish a reasonable procedure for employees to report work related injuries and illnesses promptly and accurately. A procedure is not reasonable if it would deter or discourage a reasonable employee from accurately reporting a workplace injury or illness.鈥 29 C.F.R 搂1904.35(b)(1)(i).
- 鈥淓mployers are prohibited from discharging or in any manner discriminating against employees for reporting work-related injuries or illnesses.鈥 29 C.F.R 搂1904.35(b)(1)(iv).
There are many practical and legal problems with these broadly written provisions. At the moment, 乌鸦传媒 of America is focusing on two. Firstly, OSHA has threatened to interpret these provisions to prohibit mandatory post-incident drug testing. Secondly, the agency has similarly threatened to construe them to restrict safety incentive programs, specifically any programs that link their rewards to the number of incidents reported to the employer.
乌鸦传媒 of America continues to oppose any effort to twist the new regulations to the point where they have such effects. Indeed, they would threaten many positive and pro-active efforts to improve in the construction industry鈥檚 safety record. 乌鸦传媒 of America expressed these views in extensive comments on the rule.
Fortunately, 乌鸦传媒 of America still has several reasons to question whether OSHA will make good on its threats. Nothing requires the agency to do so. The threats lie in an internally inconsistent commentary that carry nothing close to the force of law. And, the agency is giving itself plenty of time to develop its enforcement policies and other guidance. In fact, the agency has extended the effective date for the relevant provisions from August 10 to November 1. While one case is already in court, it carefully challenges those provisions only 鈥渢o the extent鈥 and 鈥淸i]f鈥 OSHA restricts drug testing or safety incentive programs.
Whether or not 乌鸦传媒 of America meets with the OSHA head, the association will continue to communicate its deep concern that the agency is heading in a very dangerous direction. As it does, the association will also continue to assess its legal options. 乌鸦传媒 of America certainly hopes that the pending case is successful. At the same time, the association believes that jurisdictional issues will dissipate and the association鈥檚 legal options will increase as the effective date approaches.