Late last week, the Associated General Contractors of America (乌鸦传媒) continued its campaign to persuade the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) to change the way it decides whether to forgive Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans of over $2M. The specific target of 乌鸦传媒鈥檚 campaign is a Loan Necessity Questionnaire that has greatly surprised and frustrated the borrowers of such loans, as they now seek forgiveness of them.
乌鸦传媒 continued its campaign with a second set of extensive comments on the SBA form, which the agency intends to help it evaluate the certifications that borrowers had to make 鈥 at the time they applied for their loans 鈥 that 鈥渆conomic uncertainty鈥 made their loans necessary to 鈥渟upport鈥 their 鈥渙ngoing鈥 operations. 乌鸦传媒鈥檚 letter pointed out that the form makes absolutely no inquiry into the nature or scope of borrowers鈥 uncertainty. The letter then explained that the form distorts the plain meaning of words like 鈥渟upport and 鈥渙ngoing,鈥 requiring borrowers to show more that the certification reasonably required. The letter maintained that borrowers only need to show that they had grounds for believing 鈥渁 loan would . . . help [them] continue to operate at least at the level necessary to forego furloughs or layoffs.鈥 Finally, the association identified specific flaws in in each of the questions relevant to construction contractors.
In the background of the association鈥檚 latest action was the legal complaint that 乌鸦传媒 filed against SBA on December 8, 2020. That complaint observed that SBA had developed the form in complete secrecy and asserted that the form violated the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Administrative Procedures Act, and the Fifth Amendment. In response to the complaint, SBA quickly released new and promising but still vague guidance on the form. Within weeks, SBA also announced that it would give the public another 60 days to comment on the form and would 鈥渟ubmit any resulting amendments . . . to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval.鈥
乌鸦传媒 filed its second set of comments on the form in response to that announcement. 乌鸦传媒 filed its first set of comments in November of 2020 in response to an earlier announcement. In its earlier comments, 乌鸦传媒 reminded the agency of the conditions that existed in March and April of 2020 鈥 when federal officials were repeatedly encouraging firms to apply for PPP loans, when the economic uncertainty confronting the industry was unprecedented, and when the vast majority of the construction contractors that successfully applied for loans of over $2M signed their certifications. In its earlier comments, 乌鸦传媒 also recounted the reasons why construction contractors require a substantial amount of working capital.
The original deadline for SBA to respond to 乌鸦传媒鈥檚 legal complaint was February 12, 2021. As that deadline approached, the agency鈥檚 lawyers sought a 45-day extension of time to file either an answer or some other response. For strategic reasons, and in the hope that its other initiatives would eventually bear fruit, and 乌鸦传媒 agreed to extend that deadline to March 29, 2021.
Over the next few weeks, 乌鸦传媒 will be deciding on its next legal moves. In the interim, if you are inclined to share your own thoughts on the form with the agency, please know that you can send them to at any time. While comments submitted to the Ombudsman will not go into the record of the administrative proceeding, they can still have an impact on the future of SBA鈥檚 Loan Necessity Questionnaire.